The challenge your team faces
The recommendation sounds right. Then your user asks for details.
Your app finds the restaurant, fits it into the itinerary, and explains why it belongs. Then a vegan user asks what they can actually eat there. That is where a convincing recommendation needs supporting information.
One traveler's dietary needs often decide where the whole group eats, so a restaurant only works if they can order something there.
Do these follow-up questions sound familiar?
Menu detail
“Which dishes are actually vegan?”
Knowing a place is vegan-friendly does not tell your product which menu items support that claim. A plausible dish name or ingredient list can sound just as convincing as a supported one.
Your team needs to distinguish menu evidence from generated detail.
Supporting information
“How do you know—and when was it checked?”
A confident answer needs a clear source and a menu collection date. Your team needs both to explain the recommendation.
Your team needs to see what the answer rests on.
User experience
“Do I need to research this myself?”
Your product recommends a restaurant, then sends the user to other sites to find out whether it suits them. Give them the menu details behind the recommendation in your own product.
Give users useful context inside your product.
When a recommendation cannot stand up to a simple follow-up, it is your product's credibility on the line.
You have already built the experience. Your team shouldn't have to build and maintain a specialist vegan evidence layer just to explain its restaurant recommendations.
Your users deserve to know what supports a recommendation.